Think I'll Get It Done Yesterday: USF 31, Clemson 26
OK, right off the top. This was not as close as the score indicated. The Bulls controlled play for probably 50 out of 60 minutes, and they had an 18-point lead with three minutes left before things got out of hand.
I want to go back to a comment GarySJ wrote in the GameThread.
You can see why Clemson is 6-6.
"They just don't do the little things right. Look at USF's first drive of the half. On 3rd-and-long, Landi spun away from a guy who should have tackled him and forced a punt, but was completely out of position. 5-foot-9 Mo Plancher ran over a guy to pick up another first down. Their quarterbacks have been throwing passes to the wrong shoulder all game long. Clemson doesn't look sharp at the point of attack on offense or defense. USF does. And of course Clemson has made a ton of mistakes.
"Clemson's talent is unmistakable. The crawl says it all; they have five players who'll go in the NFL Draft. We have one. That Bowers guy has lived up to the hype; he's tremendous. They've got some guys on offense who are scary when you get them the ball and some room to move. But Clemson hasn't done that. They just don't play to their strengths."
Does that sound like a team you might recognize? It should, because those were the kind of things we would have said about the 2009 USF team while it was getting its doors blown off by a less talented, better coached, smarter opponent. It was uncanny. Didn't the Tigers look like they were going to stick with what they wanted to do no matter how well USF countered it? Didn't the Tigers show flashes of being much more talented, and that all that was holding them back was coaching? Didn't the Tigers have that 10-minute burst of intensity and emotion at the beginning of the game, and then they faded away for most of the afternoon?
It's not like USF played a fantastic game. They still played too soft in the secondary, there wasn't a whole lot of pass rush, and they were only OK at running the ball (ignore the final stats, because those were stunted by a lot of fourth-quarter running where they were trying to drain the clock and Clemson was stacking the line). It's like I said on Twitter after the Bulls went up 31-13. All other factors being equal, if you just took the two teams and gave them equal amounts of coaching, there's no way the Bulls should be 20 points better than Clemson. They played a smarter game, and they took advantage of the Tigers' mistakes.
The only reason USF didn't finish the game 20 points better than Clemson was because of the last three minutes, where the Bulls maybe eased off the gas on defense, and Clemson got hot. What, you thought there was going to be an easy, relaxing win at the end of the season? Come on, you haven't watched enough USF football. I didn't really start to freak out until it got to 31-26, but at that point I was having a little hissy fit in my living room. It was like last year's team made a brief, five-minute cameo in the middle of this season's crowning achievement.
In this time of introspection
On the eve of my election
I say to my reflection
"God, please spare me more rejection!"
'Cause my peers, they criticize me
And my ex-wives all despise me
Try to put it all behind me
But my redneck past is nipping at my heels
(Oh I'm sorry, did you really think we would go the entire month without using this song?)
Fortunately Clemson's second onside kick didn't go 10 yards before a player touched it, or those last 45 seconds would have been really hairy.
Other random thoughts:
- B.J. Daniels finally looked healthy and at full speed. The offensive line and the game plan did a good job taking Da'Quan Bowers out of the game, but Daniels' running ability also helped. The passing plays didn't ask a whole lot of him, but he executed them very well, and he gets points for recognizing that Clemson forgot to cover Demetris Murray on the first touchdown of the game... if only because he might have missed that earlier in the season. There are still some things to work on for next season (I still don't like him throwing passes leaning sideways), but this was the best Daniels has looked since the Cincinnati game.
- The score was actually closer than it should have been because Dabo Swinney can't add. He went for two after Clemson made it 31-19 and failed, which meant when it was 4th and 7 on their next possession, they had to go it instead of kicking a field goal. That led to the questionable touchdown pass to Brandon Ford that the replay officials awarded to the Tigers, even though Jon LeJiste ripped the ball out as Ford fell to the ground. The final score probably should have been 31-23.
- It didn't work, but that reverse pass with Evan Landi made me so happy. I kind of wish they had used Landi's experience at quarterback a little bit more during the season, but I guess it wouldn't have made that much of a difference in the end.
- Lindsey Lamar has a second career as a crash test dummy if this football thing doesn't work out. I didn't know it was legal for a player to pick another player up off the ground and body slam them down.
- You think Clemson should re-do their university commercial so that it doesn't feature Dabo Swinney? The shot of him in his camo pants with "MENTOR" on the screen just killed me.
- Speaking of commercials, ESPN must have been sandbagging really hard when they talked about how well they sold spots for these bowl games. I think I saw 35 "Foundation For a Better Life" commercials today. That is not a made-up number.
- If you were disappointed with the offense this year, just remember: A.J. Love, Sterling Griffin, Darrell Scott, and Dontae Aycock all join the team next season. And that's not even counting incoming recruits or guys who redshirted this season.
- Thanks to all the seniors on this team. Dontavia Bogan, Mistral Raymond, Terrell McClain, Craig Marshall, Jacquian Williams, Moise Plancher, Sampson Genus, Jacob Sims, David Bedford, Richard Kelly, Eric Schwartz, and everyone else I can't think of at the moment.
- 246 days until South Bend. See you there.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
ESPN should have done a better job getting tickets sold for the game...
…all those empty seats look terrible on the screen.
I know it’s a trip for Floridians to North Carolina… but damn Clemson that stadium is like 2 hours drive away, and you all couldn’t be bothered to go? It would have been filled with angry Tiger fans, but at least the stadium would have been packed.
The 2010 Bucs: Considering their two-minute offense works wonders... Why can't EVERY offensive drive be run like that during the other 58 minutes of the damn game?!
I thought you would go with Army
But with the hook instead.“Been thinking a lot today…”
Good times in Charlotte. If we had pulled out a basketball miracle last night would have been a very memorable day for USF.
And if you watched this season, you can’t help but be excited about 2011.
Editor, Voodoofive.com. The Toughest Blog In America.
Congrats guys!
You all won that game in a pretty impressive fashion.
"1 - 2 - Freddy's coming for you, 3 - 4 - Better lock your door, 5 - 6 - Grab your crucifix, 7 - 8 - Better stay up late, 9 - 10 - Never sleep again..."
2010 Clemson vs 2009 USF
I have a couple beefs with that comparison.
One, I don’t think USF;s talent was ever that much better than the rest of the Big East. It was good, good enough to win a conference championship. Especially in 2007, a year we will all long lament. But the Rutgers and UConn and Cincinnati teams we lost to, and teams like Pitt in other years, weren’t a bunch of bums. Give Schiano and Edsall and Kelly and even Wannstedt a little credit for also signing quality players, and getting production out of them.
I don’t understand why Clemson is so mediocre. In terms of fan base, attendance, name recognition, and access to recruits, they have an SEC-class football program. They compete in a league that is… well, the ACC. Virginia Tech is an obstacle, but they only joined in ‘05, and they lost to James Madison for Chrissakes. FSU and Miami were mediocre most of the 2000s. Most of the rest of the league is basketball-first schools. Check this item in Stewart Mandel’s mailbag about some surprising company they keep (including USF): (scroll down to second question)
Two, Clemson’s approach to the MCCB wasn’t so much Leavittesque stick-to-the-gameplan as it was Greenbergian throw-everything-at-the-wall-and-see-what-sticks followed by completely-failing-to-recognize-what-stuck.
Their first two drives they relied heavily on screen passes: clearly that was their game plan. OK, fine. But they gave up on that pretty quickly, even though they were gaining yards with it. Then they spent most of the game running spread option plays, never figuring out that that wasn’t going to work against our defense.
They also failed to recognize plays that did work for them. Namely, throwing it over the middle to their big tight end (who showed nice hands a couple times to haul in off-target passes), and pounding the rock with their big back #8. Big tight end, big strong running back? You know, the weaknesses USF’s defense has pretty much every year since the days of the psycho goat? Remember Ray Rice? Jonathan Stewart? Carlton Jones of Army? Oklahoma’s tight end in our first TV game? Sheesh, I remember Liberty’s tight end getting some crazy numbers one time.
Did Clemson even watch any game film of our defense? Sometimes I wonder.

by 










